I found this quote from a Britney Spears fan who went to see her show in Edmonton this last Monday (I got the ‘rodie’ call but couldn’t make it …boooo) – it’s from the Edmonton Journal…
“…I would rather see a great performance and hear the songs that I love, even if they are pre-recorded, than see a performance totally sung live and they just stand there and sound bad…“
I love this. I’m not being funny or ’smart-assy’ either …but I really like this admission. In no way is this fan at all interested in the fact that Britney can or can’t sing. She (it is a female fan) is only a fan because she’s entertained. It’s not the musical ’sklllz’ that interest this person as much as it’s the Britney ’show’. That is, not just Britney, but the entire presentation that the artistic directors put together. It was the complete ‘Circus‘ that appealed …not Britney’s vocal prowess.
At this junction we can now easily subtract any musical skill from the selling feature of the artist. Britney is an image ….not a voice anymore. Yes, you may argue if she ever was I suppose. Interestingly though, even though her vocal skills are removed, you still require other musical talents to pull everything off …starting with some songs. And they have to be good. They have to be catchy. Mesmerizing. Lasting. They have to come before the skills of the performer …and not the other way around. Perhaps?
I wonder if Ella could have had a successful career if she didn’t sing anything good when she first started out? Or maybe it’s the case that certain songs wouldn’t have been very popular if certain entertainers hadn’t presented them? Is it kinda like the ‘chicken and the egg’ idea – The song or the singer? Maybe it’s a combination?
My bias is with the song of course. If you can find me any examples of crappy songs that have been successful because a certain artist performed them (and by successful I mean made good and subsequently performed and admired by both fans and musicians) then let me know. I can’t think of any, and for that reason I’m throwing my hat into the song ring. Singers need songs …song don’t need singers. I think. I mean, I love certain singers because of their voices …but I know that if they sang something completely stupid – I just couldn’t listen. But I suppose you can say the same for a bad singer singing a good song. Maybe that’s worse!
It all reminds me of my late 80’s. I loved Milli Vanilli when they were around …yes, honestly. When they had their lip-syncing fiasco, everyone jumped ship and left them on their own. Rob and Fab were abandoned. I still liked them though …and I realized why many years later. It seems Rob and Fab reached stardom on the songwriting coattails of one Frank Farian, who happened to be the man behind Boney M! He not only created Boney M, but wrote all the tunes and sang the lead male vocal. He also opened one of the first digital recording studios …going on to record Stevie Wonder’s ‘I Just Called To Say I Love You’ as well as songs for Terance Trent d’Arby and Meat Loaf. So yeah, Milli Vanilli wasn’t something lucky or pulled out of thin air …it was a musical project with a LOT of credentials behind it …and I felt these credentials were still warranted even though the vocal credits were not.
But times change. It’s now a common thing for the artist, as in Britney, to not have to be about the ability as much as the marketability …and fans have come to accept this as the norm. Britney’s voice is incidental. Music production can ‘adjust’ things. Performances can be ‘tweaked’. Britney can be fixed …we have the technology. But in the end though, I don’t think you can fix a bad song.
Or can you?