While browsing through the Edmonton Sun’s letters to the editor today, I came across some excellent examples of why we’re colorfully referred to as ‘deadmonton’. It seems that our city council had recently debated the pros and cons of hosting the 2017 World’s Fair. You’d normally think that hosting a World’s Fair might be a great way of showcasing the city to millions of people …possibly attracting future citizens and further etching the name ‘Edmonton’ on the world map. I mean, we do have some great things in this city for others to see. Don’t we?
I happen to think we do …for the most part that is. Certainly there’s crap around too, but overall I feel Edmonton people are generally kind and caring. We attempt to balance nature with technology. We try to stay abreast of new ‘trends’ while at the same time honor traditions that brought us to where we are …both good and bad at times. We’re a new city, relatively speaking, and as much as we seem to be ‘blessed’ with wealth, we attempt to balance that with education, social awareness and a civil commitment to goodwill and equality. We try at least, that’s the important thing. And lets not forget location!
However, wealth at times tends to be the deciding factor when it comes to certain ‘intangables’.
In response to city councillers’ idea of hosting a World’s Fair, there seem to be many who fail to find a good reason for such an extravagance. They view the proposed plan in terms of economics …the bottom line being, or course, money. Here are a few responses from those concerned citizens who wrote in to the Edmonton Sun… “The proposed world’s fair is to cost 1.6 – 3 billion, but will bring in an economic boost of 2.5 billion. So really, nothing.“ “It doesn’t take a degree in accounting to deduce this is a bad investment. Why is the city even considering this foolishness?“ “I don’t see how this fair is an economic win for Edmonton. Sure, some may say that you can’t put a price on international recognition, but any educated person would disagree.“
I suppose ‘educated’ in this sense might mean the ability to earn a higher wage. Hummm.
Anyway, the kicker for me was the editors reply to the final letter written by someone expressing their concern over the Sun’s constant coverage of hockey games – posting Edmonton Oiler shots on every front page while neglecting other more ‘newsworthy’ items. She stated… “I don’t need to worry that there is anything more important going on, like stock market collapses, financial recessions or our soldiers’ welfare in Afghanistan; I just glance at the front page and see that nothing more urgent could possibly be happening.“ The response from the editor was quite simple… “Oilers covers sell newspapers. It’s not complicated.” And I suppose it’s not, for when the bottom line is money, everything becomes simple …you either have it or you don’t.
And who really needs a World’s Fair in the first place. I’d rather my city be known for other more substantial things …like ‘least pot-holes per capita’.



