I’ve been thinking about the whole Second Life thing lately, and I have to wonder what it is about our ‘imagination’. It seems to be necessary for everything we do …isn’t it? And if it’s not – shouldn’t it be? I’m wondering …why does one need to escape from the ‘real world’ …sort of. But then, as M mentioned in this post, you also escape through other means that are far less controversial …TV for example. Why stop there though, what about books? Watching movies? Listening to music? Even taking a bus tour in a remote land …stopping only occasionally to get out and smell the air?
I never go on holidays. I’ve gone on a few, about 10-15 years ago now, but most of my ‘excursions’ away from home typically happen on gigs …usually in the mountains or to other larger cities. Here’s the thing about these trips though – I NEED to check the place out when I’m there, and I’m not talking about the people or the ‘man-made’ attractions or the hot spots for shopping etc. What I’m checking out, typically, is the land. It’s shape, smell, look – and when I look at buildings and other man-made items, I’m usually more interested in ‘why’ it’s there – as opposed to it just being there. Seeing what it’s made from, how it’s made etc. I’d rather go and hang out with some locals, to just see their normal way of life, than have to stop at all the ‘hot’ spots that a city has to offer. I don’t mind some of the ‘activities’ – but only when it’s something I haven’t experienced before …and I find most of the ‘touristy’ things to be pretty cliche. The funny thing is, and you might think I’m a little sheltered because of this, but I can find something exciting without really having to leave my own town! Is that strange?
Back to imagination though …I do ‘fantasize’. I think I do, that is. But not a whole lot. I know that people are boring – lol, generally, and I know that whenever I read, see, listen …sense anything that someone else created, I understand it was created by a regular person – kinda like me …boring! I know that whatever they have created, they’ve done so, most likely, for the very same reasons I find myself creating. Of course different experiences bring about different creations, but the process, or rather the reason for the process, has to be somewhat similar …doesn’t it? And this finally leads to the point of my rant…
What stimulates the creative process that people go through to be creative? What do you hear that makes you compose, see that makes you paint, observe that makes you write? What do you feel that makes you want to create? I’m wondering if most, or at least a good part, of inspiration stems from your interactions with real world activities? That is to say, the ‘real world’ stimulates your imagination. Can that be said? Contrary to that, your imagination would have to be based on your imagination …which to me seems rather weird. It would be like you lived in a box – and any experience you gain, emotion you feel etc., would be relegated to that ‘inner’ world of yours …never to be touched by the real world. Certainly you can argue that this ‘imagination circle’ might possibly stimulate others …but then you could only observe this (and take pride in it) by stepping out into real life, so to speak. If you completely internalized imagination, then any outside connection (for support or peer acknowledgment, emotional release etc.) defeats its purpose. So, can you live totally within your imagination? No, I don’t think so.
Creativity has to be based on the real world …that is, what you sense (we’re talking sight, sound, touch, taste and smell) and not on anything else. Sure, other ‘non-real’ things can stimulate your creative process, but once your process is underway, its release has to be in reality, and because of this, its core has to be based on/from the same. As much as we can imagine, and I feel many of us can do so greatly, I feel we limit ourselves without having a way to transfer …maybe ‘transpose’, that imagination into our actual lives.
And after all, if an imagination imagines in a forest, does anybody care?